Can Sinking Two US Carriers End South China Sea Spat? Chinese General Thinks So

Posted on Posted inWorld

PKONWEB Report — The US Navy is equivalent to next 13 navies put together and US defense budget is equal to next 7 largest national defense budgets in the world.

Total global foreign exchange reserves is $11.4 trillion, of which US Dollars account for almost 62% or $6.63 trillion.

Yet, the global power has its Achilles heel, point out People’s Liberation Army Academy of Military Science Deputy Director Rear Admiral Luo Yuan, which he says can be exploited to Beijing’s advantage.

Yuan’s comment comes as tensions between Washington and Beijing have escalated in recent months amid a growing number of US Navy “freedom of navigation” missions in the South China Sea and Chinese efforts to beef up its military presence in territories over which several Asian powers have overlapping claims.

Yuan has suggested a confrontational approach for tactical reasons. According to him, sinking two US supercarriers would resolve the dispute surrounding the East and South China Seas, News Corp Australia Network reported, citing Taiwanese media.

Speaking at a Chinese military industry summit on December 20, Luo took aim at the US military might, which he described as one of “five cornerstones” of possible US weakness. According to the academic, “what the United States fears the most is taking casualties.”

Pointing to China’s growing anti-ship and cruise missile capabilities, which he said are now able to get past a carrier’s escorts, Luo said that the destruction of a single carrier would cost 5,000 US servicemen’s lives, while destroying two such carriers would double the losses.

“We’ll see how frightened America is,” he said.

Speaking more broadly, Luo said that in dealing with Washington, Beijing must “use its strength to attack the enemy’s shortcomings. Attack wherever the enemy is afraid of being hit. Wherever the enemy is weak, just focus on developing [an advantage].”

On trade, for example, the admiral suggested that China has three “bargaining chips,” including soybean exports from Iowa, a state Trump must carry in the 2020 election, the US automotive industry, which he called “second-rate,” and aircraft manufacturing, which is heavily dependent on Chinese purchases.

Luo suggested the “five cornerstones” China can use to pressure the US include its military might, the dollar, its talent, the electoral system, and its fear of adversaries.

On Monday, President Trump signed the ‘Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018’ into law. According to the White House, the legislation, which authorizes $1.5 billion to counter China’s strategic influence worldwide, establishes a multi-pronged strategy for advancing US security and economic interests in the Indo-Pacific region. It has advanced the concept of “The Quad” (US, Japan, India and Australia) to counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)–the Pakistan China Economic Corridor (CPEC) is its flagship project.

As part of the plan, the US is also wooing Bangladesh to join in—last October, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Alice Wells visited Dhaka to discuss strengthening the U.S.-Bangladesh partnership and collaboration on building a secure, and interconnected Indo-Pacific region.

Last month, a Washington-based think-tank warned that the US Navy was at risk of losing its superiority, given difficulties in countering challenges “posed by great powers like China and Russia.” These threats included the latter countries’ missile capabilities and insufficient US capacity to counter them with existing missile defense systems.

China and half-a-dozen other countries including Brunei, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Taiwan have competing claims over parts of the South China Sea, a strategic and economically crucial waterway through which some $5 trillion in annual global trade passes.

China controls the vast majority of islands, reefs and shoals in the region, and has built a number of artificial islands in a bid to further shore up its claims. Beijing has insisted negotiating the issue at the regional level, with the US turning to naval freedom of navigation missions to contest China’s claims. In a separate dispute, China, Japan and South Korea have competing interpretations of the extent of their respective exclusive economic zones in the East China Sea, another strategically important waterway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *