Nawaz Trial: Justice Be Done, But Should Also Be Seen Being Done
“Truth is about perception and what we believe shapes what we perceive” ― Alan B Jones
JUN 13, 2018 — The Supreme Court has extended the deadline given to the accountability court of Islamabad for the completion of trial in corruption references against ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter and son-in-law. A two-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar, on Sunday while taking up an application moved by judge Mohammad Bashir of the accountability court, granted one-month extension to the trial court. The previous deadline given to the court for concluding the trial expired on June 9. Appearing on behalf of the former premier before the SC at its Lahore registry, Advocate Khwaja Harris said that at least six more weeks were required to complete the proceedings. CJP said the proceedings in the corruption references could be held on Saturdays and Sundays too. The CJP said the apex court wanted the accused persons and the nation come out from “this mental suffering”.
IS due process under threat or is justice being delayed? The political dimensions of a thrice-elected prime minister on trial for alleged corruption are obvious and undeniable, commented Dawn.
That the individual on trial is effectively leader of the largest political party in the country and the trial appears to be reaching a conclusion just weeks ahead of a historic and fiercely competitive general election (July 25) have significantly raised the political stakes, the paper said in its editorial.
It further said: “Yet, the law exists to provide a fair and transparent path to justice and not be swayed by emotion or politics. An order by the Supreme Court requiring the accountability court to wrap up its work in one month has triggered a sequence of events that has left the conclusion of the trial in greater uncertainty than ever.
“The lead lawyer of Mr Sharif, Khawaja Haris, has stepped down from the defense team citing an inability to work under an artificially imposed timeline, but the accountability court has now given Mr Sharif until next week to either convince Mr Haris to rejoin the Sharif legal team or hire a new lead counsel.
“The accountability court judge has also attempted to dispel an impression that the Supreme Court had mandated that the accountability court work overtime and through weekends to complete its work.
“If haste is discernible on one side, a case can be made that the other side is keen on delay. Conviction of Mr Sharif and his family members on the eve of the general election could derail the PML-N’s election campaign, especially if Mr Sharif is immediately taken into custody.
“It is possible that Mr Haris’s exit from the defense team is simply an attempt to delay the trial proceedings, which the defense has effectively already achieved for at least a few days as the accountability court awaits Mr Haris rejoining the legal team or Mr Sharif finding a new lead lawyer.
“However, an argument could also be made that the superior judiciary is unnecessarily allowing a perception to be created that it is in haste to have the accountability court complete the trial. Nawaz Sharif already stands disqualified from public and political office.
“And regardless of the outcome in the accountability court, the trial will become a part of the country’s political and legal history. It is very important then that not only justice be done, but that it is also seen to be done.”
And we agree: “Truth is about perception and what we believe shapes what we perceive” ― Alan B Jones
MQM and PTI: Humsafar Now, Humnawa in the Making
Forming a common council of elders from both sides could be a starting point. IRSHADRead More
Javed Jabbar’s Letter to The Economist On ‘Foul Editorial’
AUG 4, 2018 — Dear Mr. Editor, Greetings: Regardless of whether this letter is orRead More